Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 13, 2020

New insights on the analytical performances for detecting and quantifying monoclonal proteins

  • Mario Plebani ORCID logo EMAIL logo
  1. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Willrich MA, Katzmann JA. Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:907–19.10.1515/cclm-2015-0580Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Keren DF, Schroeder L. Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:947–61.10.1515/cclm-2015-0862Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Dimopoulos M, Kyle R, Fermand JP, Rajkumar SV, San Miguel J, Chanan-Khan A, et al. Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3. Blood 2011;117:4701–5.10.1182/blood-2010-10-299529Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Tate JR, Keren DF, Mollee P. A global call to arms for clinical laboratories – harmonised quantification and reporting of monoclonal proteins. Clin Biochem 2018;51:4–9.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Turner KA, Frinack JL, Ettore MW, Tate JR, Graziani MS, Jacobs JF, et al. An international multi-center serum protein electrophoresis accuracy and M-protein isotyping study. Part I: factors impacting limit of quantitation of serum protein electrophoresis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:533–46.10.1515/cclm-2019-1104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Jacobs JF, Turner KA, Graziani MS, Frinack JL, Ettore MW, Tate JR, et al. An international multi-center serum protein electrophoresis accuracy and M-protein isotyping study. Part II: limit of detection and follow-up of patients with small M-proteins. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:547–59.10.1515/cclm-2019-1105Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, Anderson KC, Dimopoulos M, Kyle R, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011;117:4691–5.10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Plebani M. Clinical laboratories: bigger is not always better. Diagnosis (Berlin) 2018;5:41–6.10.1515/dx-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Plebani M. Quality and future of clinical laboratories: the Vico’s whole cyclical theory of the recurring cycles. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:901–8.10.1515/cclm-2018-0009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2020-01-13
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-1266/html
Scroll to top button