Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 13, 2020

The shift of the paradigm between ageing and diseases

  • Francesco Salvatore EMAIL logo

Abstract

In the area of the Medical Sciences, the chronological age has always been, and still is, an indicator by which we try to understand the health status of an individual. However, besides considering people born with an already expressed disease, each human genome has sequence alterations called predisposing mutations; carriers of such genetic alterations have an increased risk of contracting diseases during their life. In addition, the exposome, i.e. the totality of environmental noxae (“hits”) to which our body is exposed throughout life (through ingestion, breathing, body surface hits, and psychosociological stress agents, etc.) contributes to increase gradually but inexorably the frailty of an organism, and this process is usually referred to as “physiological ageing”. This position paper proposes that we invert our visual angle and view the passage-of-time not as the cause of diseases, but consider the genome alterations present at birth and the noxae received during our life as the real major causes of ageing. The Biomedical Sciences are now increasingly unraveling the etiopathogenesis of most chronic degenerative diseases; thus, it will be possible to monitor and treat those that most contribute to the increased frailty of each person, which is now referred to with the misnomer “physiological ageing”. These concepts are not banal; indeed, they imply that we must try to avoid the causes of alterations that result later in chronic degenerative diseases. Thus, we should shift our attention from the cure to the prevention of alterations/diseases also to improve both the length and quality of our life. Moreover, this approach involves real personalized or individualized medicine, thus conferring a more direct benefit to each of us by finalizing either the cure or the monitoring of diseases.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Marcella Nunziato, Vittorio Lucignano, and Jean Gilder for the technical help in reference search, figure set-up and English language, respectively.

  1. Author contributions: The Author accepts responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Shrestha A, Martin C, Burton M, Walters S, Collins K, Wyld L. Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Psychooncology 2019;28:1367–80.10.1002/pon.5054Search in Google Scholar

2. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. Prolonging life at all costs: quantity versus quality. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4:165.10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00059-XSearch in Google Scholar

3. Hawsawi YM, Al-Numair NS, Sobahy TM, Al-Ajmi AM, Al-Harbi RM, Baghdadi MA, et al. The role of BRCA1/2 in hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019;7:1–7.10.1002/mgg3.879Search in Google Scholar

4. Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:24–32.10.1093/ije/dyr236Search in Google Scholar

5. Agier L, Basagaña X, Maitre L, Granum B, Bird PK, Casas M, et al. Early-life exposome and lung function in children in Europe: an analysis of data from the longitudinal, population-based HELIX cohort. Lancet Planet Heal 2019;3:e81–92.10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30010-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Tamayo-Uria I, Maitre L, Thomsen C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Chatzi L, Siroux V, et al. The early-life exposome: description and patterns in six European countries. Environ Int 2019;123:189–200.10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Strafella C, Caputo V, Galota MR, Zampatti S, Marella G, Mauriello S, et al. Application of precision medicine in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Neurol 2018;9:701.10.3389/fneur.2018.00701Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Abdel-Daim MM, Zakhary NI, Aleya L, Bungǎu SG, Bohara RA, Siddiqi NJ. Aging, metabolic, and degenerative disorders: biomedical value of antioxidants. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018;2018:2098123.10.1155/2018/2098123Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Olshansky SJ, Martin GM, Kirkland JL, editors. Aging: the longevity divided, 1st ed. Woodbury, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2015:243.Search in Google Scholar

10. Olshansky SJ. Articulating the case for the longevity dividend. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6:a025940.10.4324/9781315600772-13Search in Google Scholar

11. Sierra F. The emergence of geroscience as an interdisciplinary approach to the enhancement of health span and life span. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016;6:a025163.10.1101/cshperspect.a025163Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Han JDJ, Xia X, Chen W, McDermott J. Molecular and phenotypic biomarkers of aging. F1000Research 2017;6:860.10.12688/f1000research.10692.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Dodig S, Čepelak I, Pavić I. Hallmarks of senescence and aging. Biochem Medica 2019;29:030501.10.11613/BM.2019.030501Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Wagner KH, Cameron-Smith D, Wessner B, Franzke B. Biomarkers of aging: from function to molecular biology. Nutrients 2016;8:338.10.3390/nu8060338Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Jia L, Zhang W, Chen X. Common methods of biological age estimation. Clin Interv Aging 2017;12:759–72.10.2147/CIA.S134921Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Jylhävä J, Pedersen NL, Hägg S. Biological age predictors. EBioMedicine 2017;21:29–36.10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Salvatore F. Dall’invecchiamento alla longevità in buona salute: da un ossimoro ad un’endiade. Il contributo della medicina di laboratorio alla medicina personalizzata. In: Ciaccio M, Lippi G, editors. Biochimica Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio. Napoli, Italy: Edises, 2019:759–66.Search in Google Scholar

18. Salvatore F. Healthy aging: an oxymoron or a hendiadys – Rendiconti della accademia nazionale delle scienze, detta dei XL – Memorie di Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. Serie V, vol. XXXIV, parte II, 2010:31–45.Search in Google Scholar

19. Carmona JJ, Michan S. Biology of healthy aging and longevity. Rev Invest Clin 2016;68:7–16.Search in Google Scholar

20. Dzau VJ, Inouye SK, Rowe JW, Finkelman E, Yamada T. Enabling healthful aging for all – the National academy of medicine grand challenge in healthy longevity. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1699–701.10.1056/NEJMp1912298Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Navaratnarajah A, Jackson SH. The physiology of ageing. Med (United Kingdom) 2017;45:6–10.10.1016/j.mpmed.2016.10.008Search in Google Scholar

22. Radder JE, Shapiro SD, Berndt A. Personalized medicine for chronic, complex diseases: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an example. Per Med 2014;11:669–79.10.2217/pme.14.51Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Bell CG, Lowe R, Adams PD, Baccarelli AA, Beck S, Bell JT, et al. DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations. Genome Biol 2019;20:249.10.1186/s13059-019-1824-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Levine M, Lu A, Quach A, Chen B, Assimes T, Bandinelli S, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Ageing 2018;10:573–91.10.18632/aging.101414Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Heidegger M. Essere e tempo, 3rd ed. Milan, Italy: Longanesi, 2005:589.Search in Google Scholar

26. Rovelli C. L’ordine del tempo, Piccola Biblioteca Adelphi. In: Riquier C, editor. Bergson H. Historie de l’idée de temple, 11th ed. PUF, Paris: Course au College de France, 2016, Vol. 2017:705.Search in Google Scholar

27. Borysiewicz LK. Prevention is better than cure. Lancet 2010;9:572–83.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61757-8Search in Google Scholar

28. Loeser RF, Collins JA, Diekman BO. Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016;12:412–20.10.1038/nrrheum.2016.65Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Yáñez A, Cho SH, Soriano JB, Rosenwasser LJ, Rodrigo GJ, Rabe KF, et al. Asthma in the elderly: what we know and what we have yet to know. World Allergy Organ J 2014;7:8.10.1186/1939-4551-7-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Estape T. Cancer in the elderly: challenges and barriers. Asia-Pacific J Oncol Nurs 2018;5:40–2.10.4103/apjon.apjon_52_17Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Paneni F, Diaz Cañestro C, Libby P, Lüscher TF, Camici GG. The aging cardiovascular system: understanding it at the cellular and clinical levels. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1952–67.10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Mallappallil M, Friedman EA, Delano BG, Mcfarlane SI, Salifu MO. Chronic kidney disease in the elderly: evaluation and management. Clin Pract 2014;11:525–35.10.2217/cpr.14.46Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Incalzi RA, Scarlata S, Pennazza G, Santonico M, Pedone C. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Eur J Intern Med 2014;25:320–8.10.1016/j.ejim.2013.10.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Xia X, Jiang Q, McDermott J, Han JDJ. Aging and Alzheimer’s disease: comparison and associations from molecular to system level. Aging Cell 2018;17:e12802.10.1111/acel.12802Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Kalyani RR, Golden SH, Cefalu WT. Diabetes and aging: unique considerations and goals of care. Diabetes Care 2017;40:440–3.10.2337/dci17-0005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Coco D Lo, Lopez G, Corrao S. Cognitive impairment and stroke in elderly patients. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2016;12:105–16.10.2147/VHRM.S75306Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Wang S, Ren J. Obesity paradox in aging: from prevalence to pathophysiology. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2018;61:182–9.10.1016/j.pcad.2018.07.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Curtis JR, Safford MM. Management of osteoporosis among the elderly with other chronic medical conditions. Drugs Aging 2012;29:549–64.10.2165/11599620-000000000-00000Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Patel R, McKinnon BJ. Hearing loss in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 2018;34:163–74.10.1016/j.cger.2018.01.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Lochlainn MN, Kenny RA. Sexual activity and aging. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:565–72.10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Ottaviano G, Frasson G, Nardello E, Martini A. Olfaction deterioration in cognitive disorders in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 2016;28:37–45.10.1007/s40520-015-0380-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Pelletier AL, Rojas-Roldan L, Coffin J. Vision loss in older adults. Am Fam Physician 2016;94:219–26. Review. Erratum in: Am Fam Physician 2016;94:344.Search in Google Scholar

43. Imoscopi A, Inelmen EM, Sergi G, Miotto F, Manzato E. Taste loss in the elderly: epidemiology, causes and consequences. Aging Clin Exp Res 2012;24:570–9.Search in Google Scholar

44. Sanford AM. Anorexia of aging and its role for frailty. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2017;20:54–60.10.1097/MCO.0000000000000336Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Dhillon RJ, Hasni S. Pathogenesis and management of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 2017;33:17–26.10.1016/j.cger.2016.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Zhang S, Duan E. Fighting against skin aging: the way from bench to bedside. Cell Transplant 2018;27:729–38.10.1177/0963689717725755Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Sanada F, Taniyama Y, Muratsu J, Otsu R, Shimizu H, Rakugi H, et al. Source of chronic inflammation in aging. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018;5:12.10.3389/fcvm.2018.00012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Chung HY, Kim DH, Lee EK, Chung KW, Chung S, Lee B, et al. Redefining chronic inflammation in aging and age-related diseases: proposal of the senoinflammation concept. Aging Dis 2019;10:367–82.10.14336/AD.2018.0324Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science 2015;347:78–81.10.1126/science.1260825Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Luzzatto L, Pandolfi PP. Causality and chance in the development of cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:84–8.10.1056/NEJMsb1502456Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Dellino GI, Palluzzi F, Chiariello AM, Piccioni R, Bianco S, Furia L, et al. Release of paused RNA polymerase II at specific loci favors DNA double-strand-break formation and promotes cancer translocations. Nat Genet 2019;51:1011–23.10.1038/s41588-019-0421-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Corrà U, Piepoli MF. Secondary prevention: where we are. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24:14–21.10.1177/2047487317704978Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Aminde LN, Takah NF, Zapata-Diomedi B, Veerman JL. Primary and secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2018;16:22.10.1186/s12962-018-0108-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Oeppen J, Vaupel JW. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 2002;296:1029–31.10.1126/science.1069675Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Barbi E, Lagona F, Marsili M, Vaupel JW, Wachter KW. The plateau of human mortality: demography of longevity pioneers. Science 2018;360:1459–61.10.1126/science.aat3119Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Dolgin E. There’s no limit to longevity, says study that revives human lifespan debate. Nature 2018;559:14–5.10.1038/d41586-018-05582-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-02-05
Accepted: 2020-02-17
Published Online: 2020-04-13
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0125/html
Scroll to top button