Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Greenberg N. Update on current concepts and meanings in laboratory medicine – Standardization, traceability and harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:49–54.10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Armbruster D. Metrological traceability of assays and comparability of patient test results. Clin Lab Med 2017;37:119–35.10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:741–51.10.1515/cclm-2013-0075Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Aarsand AK, Sandberg S. How to achieve harmonisation of laboratory testing – the complete picture. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:8–14.10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Grubbs FE. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 1969;11:1–21.10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657Search in Google Scholar
6. Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, Weykamp C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem 2011;57:1670–80.10.1373/clinchem.2011.168641Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
