Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 22, 2021

The effect of drone transport on the stability of biochemical, coagulation and hematological parameters in healthy individuals

  • Desirée Perlee EMAIL logo , Klaas Henk van der Steege and Gijs den Besten

Abstract

Objectives

Transport of blood tubes is mainly by car or pneumatic transport. The transportation of blood tubes by drones is a novel approach for rapid transportation of blood tubes over long distances. However, limited data on the stability of biochemical, coagulation and hematological parameters is available after transport of blood tubes by drone.

Methods

To investigate the effect of drone transport on the stability of blood parameters, four test flights were performed. Blood was drawn from 20 healthy individuals and 39 of the most frequently measured blood parameters were compared between 4 groups; immediate measurement (control), late measurement, transport by car and transport by drone. Total allowable error (TAE) of the EFLM Biological Variation Database was used to determine the clinical relevance of significant differences.

Results

The majority of blood parameters were not affected by drone transport. Eight of the measured parameters showed significant differences between all the groups; glucose, phosphate, potassium, chloride, hemoglobin, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LD). A clinically relevant increase for LD after transport and a decrease for glucose values in time and after transport compared with the control group was shown.

Conclusions

Transportation of blood tubes from healthy individuals by drones has a limited clinically relevant effect. From the 39 investigated blood parameters only LD and glucose showed a clinically relevant effect.


Corresponding author: Desirée Perlee, PhD, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Isala Hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands, Phone: +31 384247642, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Medical Drone Service for the technical assistance with the drone, all volunteers who participated in this study and Erna Lenters-Westra, Jan van der Kolk and Mireille Edens for their advice.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Patel, MK, El-Khoury, JM, Simundic, EA, Farnsworth, CW, Broell, F, Genzen, JR, et al.. Evolution of blood sample transportation and monitoring technologies. Clin Chem 2021;67:812–9, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab001.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lippi, G, Mattiuzzi, C. Biological samples transportation by drones: ready for prime time? Ann Transl Med 2016;4:92, https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.02.03.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zailani, MAH, Sabudin, RZAR, Rahman, RA, Saiboon, IM, Ismail, A, Mahdy, ZA. Drone for medical products transportation in maternal healthcare: a systematic review and framework for future research. Medicine (Baltim) 2020;99:e21967, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021967.Search in Google Scholar

4. Yakushiji, F, Yakushiji, K, Murata, M, Hiroi, N, Takeda, K, Fujita, H. The quality of blood is not affected by drone transport: an evidential study of the unmanned aerial vehicle conveyance of transfusion material in Japan. Drones 2020;4:4, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4010004.Search in Google Scholar

5. Homier, V, Brouard, D, Nolan, M, Roy, MA, Pelletier, P, McDonald, M, et al.. Drone versus ground delivery of simulated blood products to an urban trauma center: the Montreal medi-drone pilot study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021;90:515–21, https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002961.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ling, G, Draghic, N. Aerial drones for blood delivery. Transfusion 2019;59:1608–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15195.Search in Google Scholar

7. Aarsand, AK, Fernandez-Calle, P, Webster, C, Coskun, A, Gonzales-Lao, E, Diaz-Garzon, J, et al.. The EFLM biological variation atabase [online]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/[Accessed 12 Mar 2021].Search in Google Scholar

8. Westgard, J. CLIA proposed acceptance limits for proficiency testing [online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/2019-clia-requirements.htm [Accessed 12 Mar 2021].Search in Google Scholar

9. Asirvatham, JR, Moses, V, Bjornson, L. Errors in potassium measurement: a laboratory perspective for the clinician. N Am J Med Sci 2013;5:255–9, https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.110426.Search in Google Scholar

10. Stankovic, AK, Smith, S. Elevated serum potassium values: the role of preanalytic variables. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121:105, https://doi.org/10.1309/UEPQUM11WH9P8JNY.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kara, H, Bayir, A, Ak, A, Degirmenci, S, Akinci, M, Agacayak, A, et al.. Hemolysis associated with pneumatic tube system transport for blood samples. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30:50–8, https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4228.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ellis, G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1265–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

13. Weaver, DK, Miller, D, Leventhal, EA, Tropeano, V. Evaluation of a computer-directed pneumatic-tube system for pneumatic transport of blood specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1978;70:400–5, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/70.3.400.Search in Google Scholar

14. Gambino, R, Piscitelli, J, Ackattupathil, TA, Theriault, JL, Andrin, RD, Sanfilippo, ML, et al.. Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis. Clin Chem 2009;55:1019–21, https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.121707.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lippi, G, Nybo, M, Cadamuro, J, Guimaraes, JT, van Dongen-Lases, E, Simundic, AM. Blood glucose determination: effect of tube additives. Adv Clin Chem 2018;84:101–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2017.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

16. Waring, WS, Evans, LE, Kirkpatrick, CT. Glycolysis inhibitors negatively bias blood glucose measurements: potential impact on the reported prevalence of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:820–3, https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2006.039925.Search in Google Scholar

17. Juricic, G, Bakliza, A, Saracevic, A, Kopcinovic, LM, Dobrijevic, S, Drmic, S, et al.. Glucose is stable during prolonged storage in un-centrifuged Greiner tubes with liquid citrate buffer, but not in serum and NaF/KOx tubes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:411–8, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0746.Search in Google Scholar

18. Johannessen, KA, Wear, NKS, Toska, K, Hansbo, M, Berg, JP, Fosse, E. Pathologic blood samples tolerate exposure to vibration and high turbulence in simulated drone flights, but plasma samples should be centrifuged after flight. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2021;9:4000110, https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3053172.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0513).


Received: 2021-04-29
Accepted: 2021-07-08
Published Online: 2021-07-22
Published in Print: 2021-10-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2021-0513/html
Scroll to top button