Abstract
Objectives
The estimates of biological variation (BV) have traditionally been determined using direct methods, which present limitations. In response to this issue, two papers have been published addressing these limitations by employing indirect methods. Here, we present a new procedure, based on indirect methods that analyses data collected within a multicenter pilot study. Using this method, we obtain CVI estimates and calculate confidence intervals (CI), using the EFLM-BVD CVI estimates as gold standard for comparison.
Methods
Data were collected over a 18-month period for 7 measurands, from 3 Spanish hospitals; inclusion criteria: patients 18–75 years with more than two determinations. For each measurand, four different strategies were carried out based on the coefficient of variation ratio (rCoeV) and based on the use of the bootstrap method (OS1, RS2 and RS3). RS2 and RS3 use symmetry reference change value (RCV) to clean database.
Results
RS2 and RS3 had the best correlation for the CVI estimates with respect to EFLM-BVD. RS2 used the symmetric RCV value without eliminating outliers, while RS3 combined RCV and outliers. When using the rCoeV and OS1 strategies, an overestimation of the CVI value was obtained.
Conclusions
Our study presents a new strategy for obtaining robust CVI estimates using an indirect method together with the value of symmetric RCV to select the target population. The CVI estimates obtained show a good correlation with those published in the EFLM-BVD database. Furthermore, our strategy can resolve some of the limitations encountered when using direct methods such as calculating confidence intervals.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Ethical approval: This protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review board of Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital (PI-21-034) in agreement with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, the Spanish law, and by the Ethical Board/Regional Ethics Committee of each Center.
References
1. Fraser, CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2001:1–28 pp.Search in Google Scholar
2. Coşkun, A, Sandberg, S, Unsal, I, Cavusoglu, C, Serteser, M, Kilercik, M, et al.. Personalized reference intervals in laboratory medicine: a new model based on within-subject biological variation. Clin Chem 2021;67:374–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa233.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Díaz-Garzón Marco, J, Fernández-Calle, P, Ricós, C. Models to estimate biological variation components and interpretation of serial results: strengths and limitations. Adv Lab Med 2020;1:20200063. https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0063.Search in Google Scholar
4. Fraser, CG, Harris, EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408368909106595.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Røraas, T, Sandberg, S, Aarsand, AK, Støve, B. A Bayesian approach to biological variation analysis. Clin Chem 2019;65:995–1005. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.300145.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Aarsand, AK, Røraas, T, Fernandez-Calle, P, Ricós, C, Díaz-Garzón, J, Jonker, N, et al.. The biological variation data critical appraisal checklist: a standard for evaluating studies on biological variation. Clin Chem 2018;64:501–14. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.281808.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Aarsand, AK, Fernandez-Calle, P, Webster, C, Coskun, A, Gonzales-Lao, E, Diaz-Garzon, J, et al.. The EFLM biological variation database; 2019. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/ [Accessed May 2022].Search in Google Scholar
8. Carobene, A. The European biological variation study (euBIVAS): delivery of updated biological variation estimates, a project by the working group on biological variation in the european federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. J Lab Precis Med 2017;2:70. https://doi.org/10.21037/jlpm.2017.08.13.Search in Google Scholar
9. Carobene, A, Strollo, M, Jonker, N, Barla, G, Bartlett, WA, Sandberg, S, et al.. Sample collections from healthy volunteers for biological variation estimates’ update: a new project undertaken by the Working Group on Biological Variation established by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1599–608. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Aarsand, AK, Kristoffersen, AH, Sandberg, S, Stove, B, Coskun, A, Fernandez-Calle, P, et al.. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS). Biological variation data for coagulation markers estimated by a Bayesian model. Clin Chem 2021;67:1259–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Ma, C, Wang, X, Wu, J, Cheng, X, Xia, L, Xue, F, et al.. Real-world big-data studies in laboratory medicine: current status, application, and future considerations. Clin Chem 2020;84:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.06.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Martinez-Sanchez, L, Marques-Garcia, F, Ozarda, Y, Blanco, A, Brouwer, N, Canalias, F, et al.. Big data and reference intervals: rationale, current practices, harmonization and standardization prerequisites and future perspectives of indirect determination of reference intervals using routine data. Adv Lab Med/Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio 2021;2:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0034.Search in Google Scholar
13. Loh, TP, Ranieri, E, Metz, MP. Derivation of pediatric within-individual biological variation by indirect sampling method. Am J Clin Pathol 2014;142:657–63. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcphzlqaeyh94hi.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Jones, GRD. Estimates of within-subject biological variation derived from pathology databases: an approach to allow assessment of the effects of age, sex, time between sample collections, and analyte concentration of reference change values. Clin Chem 2019;65:579–88. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.290841.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Tan, RZ, Markus, C, Vasikaran, S, Loh, TP, For the APFCB Harmonization of Reference Intervals Working Group. Comparison of four indirect (data mining) approaches to derive within-subject biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;60:636–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0442.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Miller, WG, Jones, GRD, Horowitz, GL, Weykamp, C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem 2011;57:1670–80. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.168641.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar
18. Hubert, M, Vandervieren, E. An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal 2008;52:5186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.008.Search in Google Scholar
19. Brys, G, Hubert, M, Struyf, A. A robust measure of skewness. J Comput Graph Stat 2004;13:996–1017. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186004x12632.Search in Google Scholar
20. Tukey, JW. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1977.Search in Google Scholar
21. Røraas, T, Støve, B, Petersen, PH, Sandberg, S. Biological variation: the effect of different distributions on estimated within-person variation and reference change values. Clin Chem 2016;62:725–36. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.252296.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Efron, B, Tibshirani, RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap, 1st ed. Dordrecht: Chapman & Hall; 1993.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9Search in Google Scholar
23. Bailey, D, Bevilacqua, V, Colantonio, DA, Pasic, MD, Perumal, N, Chan, MK, et al.. Pediatric within-day biological variation and quality specifications for 38 biochemical markers in the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem 2014;60:518–29. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.214312.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Fokkema, MR, Herrmann, Z, Muskiet, FA, Moecks, J. Reference change values for brain natriuretic peptides revisited. Clin Chem 2006;52:1602–3. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.069369.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Røraas, T, Petersen, PH, Sandberg, S. Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem 2012;58:1306–13. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.187781.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Aarsand, AK, Røraas, T, Bartlett, WA, Coşkun, A, Carobene, A, Fernandez-Calle, P, et al.. Harmonization initiatives in the generation, reporting and application of biological variation data. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1629–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0863).
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
