Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 15, 2022

Short-term biological variation of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein

  • Silje Hovden Christensen , Claus Vinter Bødker Hviid , Anne Tranberg Madsen ORCID logo , Tina Parkner and Anne Winther-Larsen EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objectives

Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker for intracerebral diseases and is approved for clinical use in traumatic brain injury. GFAP is also being investigated for several other applications, where the GFAP changes are not always outstanding. It is thus essential for the interpretation of GFAP to distinguish clinical relevant changes from natural occurring biological variation. This study aimed at estimating the biological variation of serum GFAP.

Methods

Apparently healthy subjects (n=33) had blood sampled for three consecutive days. On the second day, blood was also drawn every third hour from 9 AM to 9 PM. Serum GFAP was measured by Single Molecule Array (Simoa™). Components of biological variation were estimated in a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

The overall median GFAP value was 92.5 pg/mL (range 34.4–260.3 pg/mL). The overall within– (CVI) and between-subject variations (CVG) were 9.7 and 39.5%. The reference change value was 36.9% for an increase. No day-to-day variation was observed, however semidiurnal variation was observed with increasing GFAP values between 9 AM and 12 PM (p<0.00001) and decreasing from 12 to 9 PM (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Serum GFAP exhibits a relatively low CVI but a considerable CVG and a marked semidiurnal variation. This implies caution on the timing of blood sampling and when interpreting GFAP in relation to reference intervals, especially in conditions where only small GFAP differences are observed.


Corresponding author: Anne Winther-Larsen, MD, PhD, Associated Professor, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Aarhus, Denmark; and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Phone: +0045 7844 0000, E-mail:

Funding source: Dagmar Marshalls Fond

Funding source: Harboefonden

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the biomedical laboratory technicians at the research department of the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital.

  1. Research funding: The work was supported by Harboefonden and Dagmar Marshalls Fond. The funders did not have any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflicts of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the Central Denmark Region Committees on Biomedical Research Ethics (1-10-72-452-17).

References

1. Yang, Z, Wang, KK. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: from intermediate filament assembly and gliosis to neurobiomarker. Trends Neurosci 2015;38:364–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Messing, A, Brenner, M. GFAP at 50. ASN Neuro 2020;12:1759091420949680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759091420949680.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Abdelhak, A, Foschi, M, Abu-Rumeileh, S, Yue, JK, D’Anna, L, Huss, A, et al.. Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 2022;18:158–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00616-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Kim, R, Healey, KL, Sepulveda-Orengo, MT, Reissner, KJ. Astroglial correlates of neuropsychiatric disease: from astrocytopathy to astrogliosis. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018;87:126–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Janigro, D, Mondello, S, Posti, JP, Unden, J. GFAP and S100B: what you always wanted to know and never dared to ask. Front Neurol 2022;13:835597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.835597.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Benedet, AL, Mila-Aloma, M, Vrillon, A, Ashton, NJ, Pascoal, TA, Lussier, F, et al.. Differences between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein levels across the alzheimer disease continuum. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1471–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Michel, M, Fiebich, BL, Kuzior, H, Meixensberger, S, Berger, B, Maier, S, et al.. Increased GFAP concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with unipolar depression. Transl Psychiatry 2021;11:308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01423-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Steinacker, P, Al Shweiki, MR, Oeckl, P, Graf, H, Ludolph, AC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona, C, et al.. Glial fibrillary acidic protein as blood biomarker for differential diagnosis and severity of major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2021;144:54–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Abdelhak, A, Huss, A, Kassubek, J, Tumani, H, Otto, M. Serum GFAP as a biomarker for disease severity in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep 2018;8:14798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33158-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Huebschmann, NA, Luoto, TM, Karr, JE, Berghem, K, Blennow, K, Zetterberg, H, et al.. Comparing glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in serum and plasma following mild traumatic brain injury in older adults. Front Neurol 2020;11:1054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.01054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Deiner, S, Baxter, MG, Mincer, JS, Sano, M, Hall, J, Mohammed, I, et al.. Human plasma biomarker responses to inhalational general anaesthesia without surgery. Br J Anaesth 2020;125:282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.085.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Madsen, AT, Hojbjerg, JA, Sorensen, BS, Winther-Larsen, A. Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA. EBioMedicine 2019;49:284–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Aarsand, AK, Roraas, T, Fernandez-Calle, P, Ricos, C, Diaz-Garzon, J, Jonker, N, et al.. The biological variation data critical appraisal checklist: a standard for evaluating studies on biological variation. Clin Chem 2018;64:501–14. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.281808.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Bartlett, WA, Braga, F, Carobene, A, Coskun, A, Prusa, R, Fernandez-Calle, P, et al.. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:879–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Generation of data on within-subject biological variation in laboratory medicine: an update. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2016;53:313–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408363.2016.1150252.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Hviid, CVB, Madsen, AT, Winther-Larsen, A. Biological variation of serum neurofilament light chain. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;2360:569–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1276.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Rissin, DM, Kan, CW, Campbell, TG, Howes, SC, Fournier, DR, Song, L, et al.. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:595–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1641.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Fraser, CG, Harris, EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408368909106595.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Roraas, T, Stove, B, Petersen, PH, Sandberg, S. Biological variation: evaluation of methods for constructing confidence intervals for estimates of within-person biological variation for different distributions of the within-person effect. Clin Chim Acta 2017;468:166–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Fokkema, MR, Herrmann, Z, Muskiet, FA, Moecks, J. Reference change values for brain natriuretic peptides revisited. Clin Chem 2006;52:1602–3. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.069369.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Carobene, A, Guerra, E, Locatelli, M, Ceriotti, F, Sandberg, S, Fernandez-Calle, P, et al.. Providing correct estimates of biological variation-not an easy task. The example of S100-beta protein and neuron-specific enolase. Clin Chem 2018;64:1537–9. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.292169.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Hviid, CVB, Knudsen, CS, Parkner, T. Reference interval and preanalytical properties of serum neurofilament light chain in Scandinavian adults. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2020;80:291–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Mattila, OS, Ashton, NJ, Blennow, K, Zetterberg, H, Harve-Rytsala, H, Pihlasviita, S, et al.. Ultra-early differential diagnosis of acute cerebral ischemia and hemorrhagic stroke by measuring the prehospital release rate of GFAP. Clin Chem 2021;67:1361–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab128.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Benedict, C, Blennow, K, Zetterberg, H, Cedernaes, J. Effects of acute sleep loss on diurnal plasma dynamics of CNS health biomarkers in young men. Neurology 2020;94:e1181–e9. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000008866.Search in Google Scholar

25. Mestre, H, Mori, Y, Nedergaard, M. The brain’s glymphatic system: current controversies. Trends Neurosci 2020;43:458–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Holth, JK, Fritschi, SK, Wang, C, Pedersen, NP, Cirrito, JR, Mahan, TE, et al.. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science 2019;363:880–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2546.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Shokri-Kojori, E, Wang, GJ, Wiers, CE, Demiral, SB, Guo, M, Kim, SW, et al.. Beta-Amyloid accumulation in the human brain after one night of sleep deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:4483–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721694115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Huang, Y, Potter, R, Sigurdson, W, Kasten, T, Connors, R, Morris, JC, et al.. Beta-amyloid dynamics in human plasma. Arch Neurol 2012;69:1591–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.18107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Jurga, AM, Paleczna, M, Kadluczka, J, Kuter, KZ. Beyond the GFAP-astrocyte protein markers in the brain. Biomolecules 2021;1411:1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11091361.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. McKee, CA, Lananna, BV, Musiek, ES. Circadian regulation of astrocyte function: implications for alzheimer’s disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020;77:1049–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03314-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0480).


Received: 2022-05-17
Accepted: 2022-07-29
Published Online: 2022-08-15
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-0480/html
Scroll to top button