Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 17, 2023

Serum bicarbonate stability study at room temperature – influence of time to centrifugation and air exposure on bicarbonate measurement reported according to the CRESS checklist

  • Vesna Šupak-Smolčić ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Lucija Franin , Mihovil Horvat , Pavica Šonjić , Rebeka Svatić , Dragana Antončić , Merica Aralica , Dara Metzner , Maja Šimac and Lidija Bilić-Zulle

Abstract

Objectives

The aim was to evaluate the stability of serum bicarbonate at room temperature, depending on time to centrifugation and air exposure.

Methods

Stability study was conducted in the laboratory of Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia in January-February 2022. Nine samples from 10 volunteers were collected in clot activator gel tubes (Greiner Bio-One). Bicarbonate was measured on Beckman Coulter AU480 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA). Three tubes were left at room temperature for 30 min, three tubes for 2 h, three tubes for 4 h until centrifugation. First tube from first group (baseline) was measured immediately after centrifugation. Other measurements were expressed as percentage deviation (PD%) from baseline. First tube was remeasured after 1 and 2 h (OT_0h_1h; OT_0h_2h). Second and third tubes were opened 1 and 2 h after centrifugation (C_0h_1h; C_0h_2h). Second group of tubes was processed the same way with 2-hour centrifugation delay (WB_2h; OT_2h_1h; OT_2h_2h; C_2h_1h; C_2h_2h), and third group with 4-hour delay (WB_4h; OT_4h_1h; OT_4h_2h; C_4h_1h; C_4h_2h). PD% was compared to Maximum Permissible Difference (MPD=5.69%). MedCalc statistical software was used (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium).

Results

Bicarbonate baseline mean value (range) was 27.3 (23.4–29.6) mmol/L. Obtained PD% (95%CI) were: C_0h_1h 0.46 (−1.21, 2.12); C_0h_2h 0.18 (−2.22, 2.57); OT_0h_1h −6.46 (−7.57, −5.36); OT_0h_2h −10.67 (−12.13, −9.21); WB_2h −0.15 (−2.04, 1.74); C_2h_1h 0.01 (−1.52, 1.54); C_2h_2h −0.40 (−2.65, 1.85); OT_2h_1h −5.43 (−7.30, −3.55); OT_2h_2h −11.32 (−13.57, −9.07); WB_4h −0.85 (−3.28, 1.58); C_4h_1h −2.52 (−4.93, 0.11); C_4h_2h −3.02 (−5.62, 0.43); OT_4h_1h −7.34 (−9.64, −5.05); OT_4h_2h −11.85 (−14.38, −9.33).

Conclusions

Serum bicarbonate is stable for 4 h in closed uncentrifuged tubes, another 2 h in closed tubes after centrifugation, and is unstable within 1 h in opened tube.


Corresponding author: Vesna Šupak-Smolčić, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Rijeka Clinical Hospital Center, Tome Strizica 3 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; and Department of Medical Informatics, Rijeka University School of medicine, Rijeka, Croatia, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study complies with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013) and has been approved by the hospital Ethics Committee (Approval number 003-05/21-1/120, December 2, 2021).

  6. Data availability: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

1. Lippi, G, Betsou, F, Cadamuro, J, Cornes, M, Fleischhacker, M, Fruekilde, P, et al.. Working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE), European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM). Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:974–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1334.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Gomez-Rioja, R, Espartosa, DM, Segovia, M, Ibarz, M, Llopis, MA, Bauca, JM, et al.. Laboratory sample stability. Is it possible to define a consensus stability function? An example of five blood magnitudes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1806–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-1189.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Gomez-Rioja, R, Amaro, MS, Diaz-Garzon, J, Bauca, JM, Espartosa, DM, Fernandez-Calle, P. A protocol for testing the stability of biochemical analytes. Technical document. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:1829–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0586.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Hedayati, M, Razavi, SA, Boroomand, S, Kia, SK. The impact of preanalytical variations on biochemical analytes stability: a systematic review. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23551.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Dupuy, AM, Cristol, JP, Vincent, B, Bargnoux, AS, Mendes, M, Philibert, P, et al.. Stability of routine biochemical analytes in whole blood and plasma/serum: focus on potassium stability from lithium heparin. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:413–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0292.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Oddoze, C, Lombard, E, Portugal, H. Stability study of 81 analytes in human whole blood, in serum and in plasma. Clin Biochem 2012;45:464–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Monneret, D, Godmer, A, Le Guen, R, Bravetti, C, Emeraud, C, Marteau, A, et al.. Stability of routine biochemical analytes in whole blood and plasma from lithium heparin gel tubes during 6 hour storage. J Clin Lab Anal 2016;30:602–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21909.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Kraut, JA, Madias, NE. Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010;6:274–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2010.33.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1–150.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ng, WY, Yeo, CP. Thrombin-accelerated quick clotting serum tubes: an evaluation with 22 common biochemical analytes. Adv Hematol 2013;2013:e769479. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/769479.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. van Balveren, JA, Gemen, EFA, Kusters, R. Recentrifugation of lithium heparin gel separator tubes up to 8h after blood collection has no relevant influence on the stability of 30 routine biochemical analytes. J Appl Lab Med 2019;3:864–9. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2018.026567.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Henriksen, LO, Faber, NR, Moller, MF, Nexo, E, Hansen, AB. Stability of 35 biochemical and immunological routine tests after 10 hours storage and transport of human whole blood at 21 °C. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2014;74:603–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2014.928940.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Boyanton, BL, Blick, K. Stability studies of twenty four analytes in human plasma and serum. Clin Chem 2002;48:2242–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.12.2242.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jinks, D, Brooks-White, R, Bush, V. Evaluation of refrigerated stability of 15 analytes in lithium heparin gel primary tubes. Lab Med 2013;44:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1309/lmhfg0q5eykscldt.Search in Google Scholar

15. van Vracken, MJ, Briscoe, D, Anderson, KM, Wians, FH. Time dependent stability of 22 analytes in lithium plasma specimens stored at refrigerator temperature for up to 4 days. Lab Med 2012;43:268–75.10.1309/LM53SBZ4VQGWVQOMSearch in Google Scholar

16. Nonkes, LJP, van Gelder, MK, Kemperman, H, Abrahams, AC, Boereboom, FTJ, Ten Berg, MJ, et al.. Improving home haemodialysis: stability evaluation of routine clinical chemistry analytes in blood samples of haemodialysis patients. Biochem Med 2019;29:010709. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.010709.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Beckman Coulter (BC). Instructions for use – CO2 bicarbonate. Lismeehan, O’Callaghan’s Mills, Co. Clare, Ireland: Beckman Coulter Inc; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

18. Cornes, M, Simundic, AM, Cadamuro, J, Costelloe, SJ, Baird, G, Kristensen, GBB, et al.. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG.PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Simundic, AM, Bölenius, K, Cadamuro, J, Church, S, Cornes, MP, van Dongen-Lases, EC, et al.. Working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE), of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) and Latin American working group for preanalytical phase (WG-PRE-LATAM) of the Latin America confederation of clinical biochemistry (COLABIOCLI). Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:2015–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0602.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Aarsand, AK, Fernandez-Calle, P, Webster, C, Coskun, A, Gonzales-Lao, E, Diaz-Garzon, J, et al.. The EFLM biological variation database. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/ [Accessed 18 Nov 2022].Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1182).


Received: 2022-11-19
Accepted: 2022-12-28
Published Online: 2023-01-17
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2022-1182/html
Scroll to top button