Abstract
From External Quality Assessment data, current harmonization of CRP measuring systems appears to be satisfactory, the inter-assay CV being well below 10%. The inter-method variability is even better (close to 3%) when the widely used measuring systems are compared at CRP concentrations employed as cut-off for detecting sub-clinical infection (i.e., 10.0 mg/L) and measurement variability estimated, according to ISO 20914:2019 Technical Specification, from the intermediate within-lab reproducibility of 6-month consecutive measurement data. According to the state-of-the-art model (which is better suited for CRP), the maximum allowable measurement uncertainty (MAU) for CRP measurement on clinical samples with 10.0 mg/L concentrations is 3.76% (desirable quality). As measurement uncertainty (MU) of the only available reference material (ERM-DA474/IFCC) is ∼3%, to fulfil desirable MAU on clinical samples, IVD manufacturers should work to keep the contribution of remaining MU sources (commercial calibrator and intermediate within-lab reproducibility) lower than 2.3%.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
References
1. Whicher, JT, Ritchie, RF, Johnson, AM, Baudner, S, Bienvenu, J, Blirup-Jensen, S, et al.. New international reference preparation for proteins in human serum (RPPHS). Clin Chem 1994;40:934–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.6.934.Search in Google Scholar
2. Whicher, JT. BCR/IFCC reference material for plasma proteins (CRM 470). Community Bureau of Reference. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Clin Biochem 1998;31:459–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00035-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Johnson, AM, Whicher, JT, Ledue, TB, Carlström, A, Itoh, Y, Petersen, PH. Effect of a new international reference preparation for proteins in human serum (certified reference material 470) on results of the College of American Pathologists Surveys for plasma proteins. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1496–501. https://doi.org/10.5858/2000-124-1496-eoanir.Search in Google Scholar
4. Merlini, G, Blirup-Jensen, S, Johnson, AM, Sheldon, J, Zegers, I. IFCC Committee on Plasma Proteins (C-PP). Standardizing plasma protein measurements worldwide: a challenging enterprise. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1567–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Infusino, I, Valente, C, Dolci, A, Panteghini, M. Standardization of ceruloplasmin measurements is still an issue despite the availability of a common reference material. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;397:521–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3248-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Rzychon, M, Zegers, I, Schimmel, H. Analysis of the physicochemical state of C-reactive protein in different preparations including two certified reference materials. Clin Chem 2010;56:1475–82. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.147124.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Zegers, I, Schreiber, W, Linstead, S, Lammers, M, McCusker, M, Muñoz, A, et al.. Development and preparation of a new serum protein reference material: feasibility studies and processing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:805–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.166.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Panteghini, M, Braga, F, Camara, JE, Delatour, V, Van Uytfanghe, K, Vesper, HW, et al.. JCTLM Task Force on Reference Measurement System Implementation. Optimizing available tools for achieving result standardization: value added by Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM). Clin Chem 2021;67:1590–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab178.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Secchiero, S, Sciacovelli, L, Plebani, M. Performance evaluation of 14 specific proteins measurement checked by an External Quality Assessment Scheme. Clin Chim Acta 2020;502:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Derivation of performance specifications for uncertainty of serum C-reactive protein measurement according to the Milan model 3 (state of the art). Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:e263–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0532.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Medical laboratories—practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty. ISO/TS 20914. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
12. Infusino, I, Panteghini, M. Measurement uncertainty: friend or foe? Clin Biochem 2018;57:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. The utility of measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1407–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1336.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. ISO 17511:2020. In vitro diagnostic medical devices—requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
15. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Verification of in vitro medical diagnostics (IVD) metrological traceability: responsibilities and strategies. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.022.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Braga, F, Infusino, I, Panteghini, M. Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:905–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1240.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Defining permissible limits for the combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability. Clin Biochem 2018;57:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. ISO15189:2012. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2012.Search in Google Scholar
19. Thelen, M, Vanstapel, F, Brguljan, PM, Gouget, B, Boursier, G, Barrett, E, et al.. European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). Documenting metrological traceability as intended by ISO 15189:2012: a consensus statement about the practice of the implementation and auditing of this norm element. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:459–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1212.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Panteghini, M. Implementation of standardization in clinical practice: not always an easy task. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1237–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2011.791.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Sandberg, S, Fraser, CG, Horvath, AR, Jansen, R, Jones, G, Oosterhuis, W, et al.. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0067.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Ceriotti, F, Fernandez-Calle, P, Klee, GG, Nordin, G, Sandberg, S, Streichert, T, et al.. EFLM Task and Finish Group on Allocation of laboratory tests to different models for performance specifications (TFG-DM). Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:189–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0091.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Panteghini, M, Ceriotti, F, Jones, G, Oosterhuis, W, Plebani, M, Sandberg, S. Task Force on Performance Specifications in Laboratory Medicine of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: three years on from the Milan Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1849–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0772.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Performance specifications for measurement uncertainty of common biochemical measurands according to Milan models. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1362–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0170.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Braga, F, Pasqualetti, S, Borrillo, F, Capoferri, A, Chibireva, M, Rovegno, L, et al.. Definition and application of performance specifications for measurement uncertainty of 23 common laboratory tests: linking theory to daily practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:213–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0806.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Biologic variability of C-reactive protein: is the available information reliable? Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Braga, F, Ferraro, S, Szöke, D, Lanzoni, M, Panteghini, M. Estimate of intraindividual variability of C-reactive protein: a challenging issue. Clin Chim Acta 2013;419:85–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.02.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Alexander, KS, Kazmierczak, SC, Snyder, CK, Oberdorf, JA, Farrell, DH. Prognostic utility of biochemical markers of cardiovascular risk: impact of biological variability. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1875–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0750.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Franzini, C. Need for correct estimates of biological variation: the example of C-reactive protein. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:131–2. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1998.024.Search in Google Scholar
30. Braga, F, Ferraro, S, Ieva, F, Paganoni, A, Panteghini, M. A new robust statistical model for interpretation of differences in serial test results from an individual. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:815–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0893.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Carobene, A, Aarsand, AK, Guerra, E, Bartlett, WA, Coşkun, A, Díaz-Garzón, J, et al.. European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Biological Variation. European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): within- and between-subject biological variation data for 15 frequently measured proteins. Clin Chem 2019;65:1031–41. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.304618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Braga, F, Pasqualetti, S, Aloisio, E, Panteghini, M. The internal quality control in the traceability era. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0371.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Panteghini, M. Redesigning the surveillance of in vitro diagnostic medical devices and of medical laboratory performance by quality control in the traceability era. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:759–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1257.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
