Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 24, 2023

Effects of storage conditions on the stability of blood-based markers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

  • Andrea Mansilla , Marina Canyelles , Rosa Ferrer , Javier Arranz , Íñigo Rodríguez-Baz , Nuole Zhu , Sara Rubio-Guerra ORCID logo , Shaimaa El Bounasri , Oriol Sánchez , Soraya Torres , Juan Fortea , Alberto Lleó , Daniel Alcolea EMAIL logo and Mireia Tondo ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objectives

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is considered the most common cause of dementia in older people. Recently, blood-based markers (BBM) Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and phospho Tau181 (p-Tau181) have demonstrated the potential to transform the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of AD. Our aim was to investigate the effect of different storage conditions on the quantification of these BBM and to evaluate the interchangeability of plasma and serum samples.

Methods

Forty-two individuals with some degree of cognitive impairment were studied. Thirty further patients were retrospectively selected. Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and p-Tau181 were quantified using the LUMIPULSE-G600II automated platform. To assess interchangeability between conditions, correction factors for magnitudes that showed strong correlations were calculated, followed by classification consistency studies.

Results

Storing samples at 4 °C for 8–9 days was associated with a decrease in Aβ fractions but not when stored for 1–2 days. Using the ratio partially attenuated the pre-analytical effects. For p-Tau181, samples stored at 4 °C presented lower concentrations, whereas frozen samples presented higher ones. Concerning classification consistency in comparisons that revealed strong correlations (p-Tau181), the percentage of total agreement was greater than 90 % in a large number of the tested cut-offs values.

Conclusions

Our findings provide relevant information for the standardization of sample collection and storage in the analysis of AD BBM in an automated platform. This knowledge is crucial to ensure their introduction into clinical settings.


Corresponding authors: Daniel Alcolea, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, C/Sant Quintí 89, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; Sant Pau Memory Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau) Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; and Centre of Biomedical Investigation Network for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain, Phone: +34 93 5537358, E-mail: ; and Mireia Tondo, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, C/Sant Quintí 89, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB) Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Centre of Biomedical Investigation Network for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases (CIBERDEM), Madrid, Spain; and Comisión de Neuroquímica y Enfermedades Neurológicas, Sociedad Española de Medicina de Laboratorio, Barcelona, Spain, Phone: +34 93 5537358, E-mail:
Andrea Mansilla and Marina Canyelles contributed equally to this work.

Award Identifier / Grant number: PI21/00140; PI18/00435; INT19/00016; PI17/01896; A

Award Identifier / Grant number: H2020-SC1-BHC-2018-2020/GA 965422

Funding source: Generalitat de Catalunya

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2017-SGR-547; SLT006/17/125; SLT002/16/408

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20142610

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of this study and all the members of the clinical and biochemical teams involved in the study.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by CIBERDEM and CIBERNED and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI21/00140 to MT, PI18/00435 and INT19/00016 to DA, PI17/01896 and AC19/00103 to AL), funded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Unión Europea, “Una manera de hacer Europa”. This work was also supported by Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-547, SLT006/17/125 to DA, SLT002/16/408 to AL), European Union’s Horizon 2020, ‘MES-CoBraD’ (H2020-SC1-BHC-2018-2020/GA 965422 to JF), and “Marató TV3” foundation grants 20142610 to AL. We thank Fujirebio Europe NV for kindly providing the necessary reagents to perform the study.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: All participants gave written informed consent before enrolment in accordance with the guidelines of the local Ethics Committee.

References

1. de Souza, LC, Sarazin, M, Goetz, C, Dubois, B. Clinical investigations in primary care. Front Neurol Neurosci 2009;24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000197897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Nichols, E, Steinmetz, JD, Vollset, SE, Fukutaki, K, Chalek, J, Abd-Allah, F, et al., GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health 2022;7:e105-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00249-8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Jack, CR, Bennett, DA, Blennow, K, Carrillo, MC, Dunn, B, Haeberlein, SB, et al.. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Dubois, B, Feldman, HH, Jacova, C, Hampel, H, Molinuevo, JL, Blennow, K, et al.. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:614–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70090-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lleó, A, Cavedo, E, Parnetti, L, Vanderstichele, H, Herukka, SK, Andreasen, N, et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in trials for Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.232.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. van der Kant, R, Goldstein, LSB, Ossenkoppele, R. Amyloid-β-independent regulators of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2020;21:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0240-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Blennow, K. Dementia in 2010: paving the way for Alzheimer disease drug development. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7:65–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2010.214.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Lewczuk, P, Riederer, P, O’Bryant, SE, Verbeek, MM, Dubois, B, Visser, PJ, et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: an update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatr 2018;19:244–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Delaby, C, Teunissen, CE, Blennow, K, Alcolea, D, Arisi, I, Amar, EB, et al.. Clinical reporting following the quantification of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: an international overview. Alzheimers Dement 2022;18:1868–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12545.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Janelidze, S, Teunissen, CE, Zetterberg, H, Allué, JA, Sarasa, L, Eichenlaub, U, et al.. Head-to-head comparison of 8 plasma amyloid-β 42/40 assays in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1375–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3180.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Hansson, O, Edelmayer, RM, Boxer, AL, Carrillo, MC, Mielke, MM, Rabinovici, GD, et al.. The Alzheimer’s Association appropriate use recommendations for blood biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2022;18:2669–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12756.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Hansson, O, Mikulskis, A, Fagan, AM, Teunissen, C, Zetterberg, H, Vanderstichele, H, et al.. The impact of preanalytical variables on measuring cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis: a review. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:1313–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Verberk, IMW, Misdorp, EO, Koelewijn, J, Ball, AJ, Blennow, K, Dage, JL, et al.. Characterization of pre-analytical sample handling effects on a panel of Alzheimer’s disease-related blood-based biomarkers: results from the Standardization of Alzheimer’s Blood Biomarkers (SABB) working group. Alzheimers Dement 2022;18:1484–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12510.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Rózga, M, Bittner, T, Batrla, R, Karl, J. Preanalytical sample handling recommendations for Alzheimer’s disease plasma biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2019;11:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.02.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Ashton, NJ, Suárez-Calvet, M, Karikari, TK, Lantero-Rodriguez, J, Snellman, A, Sauer, M, et al.. Effects of pre-analytical procedures on blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s pathophysiology, glial activation, and neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2021;13:e12168. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12168.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Mariani, E, Monastero, R, Mecocci, P. Mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 2007;12:23–35. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2007-12104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Chang, JF, Liu, HC, Chen, HH, Chen, WP, Juang, JL, Wang, PN, et al.. Effect of times to blood processing on the stability of blood proteins associated with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2020;49:303–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509358.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Keshavan, A, Heslegrave, A, Zetterberg, H, Schott, JM. Stability of blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease over multiple freeze-thaw cycles. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2018;10:448–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Liu, HC, Chiu, MJ, Lin, CH, Yang, SY. Stability of plasma amyloid-β 1-40, amyloid-β 1-42, and total tau protein over repeated freeze/thaw cycles. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 2020;10:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506278.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Musso, G, Cosma, C, Zaninotto, M, Gabelli, C, Basso, D, Plebani, M. Pre-analytical variability of the Lumipulse immunoassay for plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:e53–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0770.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Alcolea, D, Clarimón, J, Carmona-Iragui, M, Illán-Gala, I, Morenas-Rodríguez, E, Barroeta, I, et al.. The Sant Pau Initiative on Neurodegeneration (SPIN) cohort: a data set for biomarker discovery and validation in neurodegenerative disorders. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2019;5:597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Ferrer, R, Zhu, N, Arranz, J, Porcel, I, El Bounasri, S, Sánchez, O, et al.. Importance of cerebrospinal fluid storage conditions for the Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics on an automated platform. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:1058–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0134.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Pannee, J, Shaw, LM, Korecka, M, Waligorska, T, Teunissen, CE, Stoops, E, et al.. The global Alzheimer’s Association round robin study on plasma amyloid β methods. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2021;13:e12242. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12242.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Kac, PR, Gonzalez-Ortiz, F, Simrén, J, Dewit, N, Vanmechelen, E, Zetterberg, H, et al.. Diagnostic value of serum versus plasma phospho-tau for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res Ther 2022;14:65. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.067140.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-01-16
Accepted: 2023-04-12
Published Online: 2023-04-24
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0245/html
Scroll to top button