Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 5, 2023

Exploration of suitable external quality assessment materials for serum C-peptide measurement

  • Yuhang Deng ORCID logo , Chao Zhang , Bingqiong Li , Jing Wang , Jie Zeng , Jiangtao Zhang , Tianjiao Zhang , Haijian Zhao , Weiyan Zhou EMAIL logo and Chuanbao Zhang ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objectives

To find suitable external quality assessment (EQA) materials for serum C-peptide, we evaluated the commutability of five types of processed materials.

Methods

Seventy-four individual serum samples and 12 processed samples including three EQA samples currently in use, frozen human serum pools (FHSP), and three other kinds of processed samples were prepared by dissolving WHO International Standard Reagent for C-peptide (WHO ISR 13/146) in three different matrixes: 0.05 % bovine serum albumin, fetal bovine serum and human serum pools. Samples were analyzed using the isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) method and six widely used immunoassays. The commutabilities of processed materials were assessed according to the difference in bias approach recommended by the IFCC. And the short- and long-term stability of FHSP samples at different temperatures were also evaluated.

Results

Out of the five kinds of processed materials, FHSP samples were commutable on most assays. In contrast, the EQA materials currently in use were only commutable on a few immunoassays. Additionally, processed materials derived from WHO ISR 13/146 were found to be un-commutable on over half of immunoassays. The FHSP samples could be stably stored at 4 and −20 °C for at least 16 days, and at −80 °C for at least 1 year, but at room temperature only for 12 h.

Conclusions

With clarified commutability and stability information, the human serum pool samples along with the developed ID-LC-MS/MS method could be used in the EQA program to promote the comparability among laboratories for C-peptide measurement in China.


Corresponding authors: Weiyan Zhou and Chuanbao Zhang, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Dahua Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, P.R. China, Phone: +86 010 58115059, Fax: +86 010 65132968, E-mail: ,

Funding source: Beijing Natural Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 7212087

Funding source: National Key Research and Development Program of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2022YFF0710301

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the colleagues at West China Hospital, Sichuan University Department of Laboratory Medicine; Beijing Aerospace General Hospital Department of Laboratory Medicine; Snibe Diagnostic Co. Ltd. Shenzhen China; and Mindray Co. Ltd. Shenzhen China for their kind assistance in testing samples during this study.

  1. Research funding: Beijing Natural Science Foundation: No. 7212087. National Key Research and Development Program of China, Grant Number: No. 2022YFF0710301.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital approved this study and exempted the need for obtaining informed consent (2018BJYYEC-019-01).

References

1. Zimmet, P, Alberti, KG, Magliano, DJ, Bennett, PH. Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016;12:616–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Guariguata, L, Whiting, DR, Hambleton, I, Beagley, J, Linnenkamp, U, Shaw, JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:137–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Leighton, E, Sainsbury, CA, Jones, GC. A practical review of C-peptide testing in diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2017;8:475–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Jones, AG, Hattersley, AT. The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:803–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12159.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Zhou, W, Deng, Y, Zhao, H, Zhang, C. Current status of serum insulin and C-peptide measurement in clinical laboratories: experience from 94 laboratories in China. Ann Lab Med 2022;42:428–37. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.428.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Zhang, S, Zeng, J, Zhang, C, Li, Y, Zhao, H, Cheng, F, et al.. Commutability of possible external quality assessment materials for cardiac troponin measurement. PLoS One 2014;9:e102046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102046.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Jones, GR. The role of EQA in harmonization in laboratory medicine – a global effort. Biochem Med 2017;27:23–9. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2017.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Deng, Y, Zhang, C, Wang, J, Zeng, J, Zhang, J, Zhang, T, et al.. An accurate isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for serum C-peptide and its use in harmonization in China. Ann Lab Med 2023;43:345–54. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.4.345.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Miller, WG, Schimmel, H, Rej, R, Greenberg, N, Ceriotti, F, Burns, C, et al.. IFCC working group recommendations for assessing commutability part 1: general experimental design. Clin Chem 2018;64:447–54. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.277525.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Nilsson, G, Budd, JR, Greenberg, N, Delatour, V, Rej, R, Panteghini, M, et al.. IFCC working group recommendations for assessing commutability part 2: using the difference in bias between a reference material and clinical samples. Clin Chem 2018;64:455–64. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.277541.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. CLSI. EP09-A3. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

12. Little, RR, Wielgosz, RI, Josephs, R, Kinumi, T, Takatsu, A, Li, H, et al.. Implementing a reference measurement system for C-peptide: successes and lessons learned. Clin Chem 2017;63:1447–56. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.269274.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Kinumi, T, Mizuno, R, Takatsu, A. Quantification of serum C-peptide by isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: enhanced detection using chemical modification and immunoaffinity purification. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 2014;953–954:138–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.02.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Kinumi, T, Goto, M, Eyama, S, Kato, M, Kasama, T, Takatsu, A. Development of SI-traceable C-peptide certified reference material NMIJ CRM 6901-a using isotope-dilution mass spectrometry-based amino acid analyses. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012;404:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6097-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Stoyanov, AV, Rohlfing, CL, Connolly, S, Roberts, ML, Nauser, CL, Little, RR. Use of cation exchange chromatography for human C-peptide isotope dilution – mass spectrometric assay. J Chromatogr A 2011;1218:9244–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.080.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Little, RR, Rohlfing, CL, Tennill, AL, Madsen, RW, Polonsky, KS, Myers, GL, et al.. Standardization of C-peptide measurements. Clin Chem 2008;54:1023–6. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.101287.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0215).


Received: 2023-02-27
Accepted: 2023-04-19
Published Online: 2023-05-05
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0215/html
Scroll to top button