Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 31, 2023

Chatbot GPT can be grossly inaccurate

  • Eleftherios P. Diamandis ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Corresponding author: Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Senior Scientist, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Eleftherios Diamandis holds an advisory and consultation role with Abbott Diagnostics.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Plebani, M. ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1131–2. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0387.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Fernandes, AC, Souto, MEVC. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med 2023;388:2399–400. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2305286.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-07-19
Accepted: 2023-07-23
Published Online: 2023-07-31
Published in Print: 2024-01-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0765/html
Scroll to top button