-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Stove, V, Slabbinck, A, Vanoverschelde, L, Hoste, E, De Paepe, P, Delanghe, J. How to solve the underestimated problem of overestimated sodium results in the hypoproteinemic patient. Crit Care Med 2016;44:e83–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000001304.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Dimeski, G, Morgan, TJ, Presneill, JJ, Venkatesh, B. Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital. J Crit Care 2012;27:326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Ricós, C, Alvarez, V, Cava, F, García-Lario, JV, Hernández, A, Jiménez, CV, et al.. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Investig 1999;59:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365519950185229.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Aarsand, AK, Fernandez-Calle, P, Webster, C, Coskun, A, Gonzales-Lao, E, Diaz-Garzon, J, et al.. The EFLM biological variation database; 2023 [Accessed 23 June 2023].Search in Google Scholar
5. Sicker, T, Federbusch, M, Eckelt, F, Isermann, B, Fenske, W, Fries, C, et al.. Challenge in hyponatremic patients – the potential of a laboratory-based decision support system for hyponatremia to improve patient’s safety. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1025–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0883.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
