Acknowledgments
ChatGPT (v3.5) was used for checking grammar, structure and spelling.
-
Research ethics: The study was approved by the local research board of the JBH. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and in accordance with all relevant local legislations.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: SK initiated the study, performed the analyses and wrote the manuscript. RK, JK and AS collected data, analysed data and provided feedback.
-
Competing interests: All authors have read the journal’s policy on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and have none to declare.
-
Research funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
-
Data availability: Information and data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. ChatGPT v4.0 text results (cases with reference values) can be found in the supplementary data.
References
1. Lee, P, Bubeck, S, Petro, J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1233–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr2214184.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Ayers, JW, Poliak, A, Dredze, M, Leas, EC, Zhu, Z, Kelley, JB, et al.. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Intern Med 2023;183:589. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Duffourc, M, Gerke, S. Generative AI in health care and liability risks for physicians and safety concerns for patients. JAMA 2023;330:313. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.9630.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Plebani, M. ChatGPT: angel or demond? Critical thinking is still needed. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1131–2. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0387.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Kurstjens, S, van der Horst, A, Herpers, R, Geerits, MWL, Kluiters-de Hingh, YCM, Göttgens, EL, et al.. Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at the emergency department using routine testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1587–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM-2020-0593/PDF.Search in Google Scholar
6. Kurstjens, S, de Bel, T, van der Horst, A, Kusters, R, Krabbe, J, van Balveren, J. Automated prediction of low ferritin concentrations using a machine learning algorithm. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:1921–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-1194.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Khorwanichakij, N, Kungwankiattichai, S, Owattanapanich, W. Validation of several formulas to differentiate thalassemia from iron deficiency anemia and proposal of a thalassemia–iron deficiency discrimination (TID) predictive score. Siriraj Med J 2022;74:256–65. https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.32.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0885).
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
